Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 282-294 (2012)



Ye Lu 1,* and Guoqiang Li 2

1 Doctor, Department of Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering

Tongji University, Shanghai, China

2 Professor, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction of Civil Engineering

Tongji University, Shanghai, China

*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Received: 28 July 2011; Revised: 26 August 2011; Accepted: 22 September 2011




View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote


As a promising lateral load resisting elements in new or retrofit construction of buildings, buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall (BRSW) clamed with concrete plates had gained a great deal of attention of researchers and engineers. However, almost all of BRSWs being studied and employed are in small height-to-width ratio. Actually, in some situations, slim BRSW may be more serviceable if there do not have enough space to put wide BRSWs. Moreover, a new type BRSW was proposed in this paper. Several experimental investigations had been conducted on this BRSW, including monotonic loading tests and cyclic loading tests on four sets of specimens with different height-to-width ratio from 2:1 to 4:1, as well as comparative tests on normal steel plate shear walls. The detailing of the walls was modified to improve their energy dissipation. A simplified equivalent cross-brace model was presented and verified by finite element analyses.



Buckling-Restrained, Steel plate shear wall, Experimental study, Simplification model


[1]     Chen, W.F. and Toma, S., “Advanced Analysis of Steel Frames”, London-Tokyo: CRC Press, 1994.

[2]     Narayanan, R. ed, “Steel Framed Structures, Stability and Strength”, Elsevier Science, 1985.

[3]     Machowski, A., “Problems of Limit States and Reliability of Steel Multistory Building Frames”, Monograph No. 262, Cracow University of Technology, 1999 [in Polish].

[4]     Fukumoto, Y. and Itoh, Y., “Multiple Buckling Curves Based on Experimental Data”, Construction Metállique, 1984, Vol. 3 [in French].

[5]     CEN “EN 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3, Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings”.

[6]     PKNMiJ, “PN-90/B-03200, Steel Structures, Design Rules” [in Polish].

[7]     Allen, D., “Merchant-Rankine Approach to Member Stability”, Journal of the Structural Division, 1978, 104 (ST.12), pp. 1909-1914.

[8]     Rondal, J. and Maquoi, R., “The Ayrton-Perry Formulation for Buckling of Metallic Bars”, Construction Metállique, 1979, 4, pp. 41-53 [in French].

[9]     Murzewski, J., “Design of Steel Structures for Differentiated Reliability Levels”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2008, LIV(1), pp. 209-237.

[10]   ECCS, “European Specifications for Steel Structures”, 1-st ed; 1974.

[11]   Papoulis, A., “Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes”, McGraw-Hill Inc, 1965.

[12]   Machowski, A., “Initial Random Out-of-plumbs of Steel Frame Columns”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2002, XLVIII(2), pp. 207-226.

[13]   Beaulieu, D. and Adams, P.F., “The Results of a Survey on Structural Out-of-plumbs”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1978, Vol. 5, pp. 642-470.

[14]   Lindner, J. and Gietzelt, R., “Evaluation of Imperfections of Support – Elements”, Stahlbau, 1984, Vol. 4, pp. 97-98 [in German].

[15]   Machowski, A. and Tylek, I., “Conceptions of Equivalent Imperfections in Analysis of Steel Frames”, The International Journal of Advanced Steel Construction,  2008, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 13-25.

[16]   Tylek, I., “Equivalent Geometrical Imperfections of Multistory Steel Building Frames”, Doctoral Thesis, Cracow University of Technology, 2007 [in Polish].

[17]   De Luca A. and Mele, E., “Analysis of Steel Frames in the Light of Eurocode 3 and New Research Results”, In: White, D.W. and Chen, W.F. ed., “Plastic Hinge Based Methods for Advanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames”, SSRC, Lehigh Univ., 1993, pp. 97-152.