Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 295-316 (2012)


VISCOUS DISSIPATIVE, DUCTILITY-BASED AND ELASTIC BRACING DESIGN

SOLUTIONS FOR AN INDOOR SPORTS STEEL BUILDING

 

Stefano Sorace 1,*, Gloria Terenzi 2 and Gianluca Bertino 1

1 Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Udine

Via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy

2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence

Via S. Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy

*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Received: 21 December 2011; Revised: 28 June 2012; Accepted: 31 July 2012

DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2012.8.3.7

 

View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote

ABSTRACT

Three bracing solutions are developed for an indoor sports facility representative of the most recent architectural design trends for recreational and commercial steel buildings. A viscous-dissipative bracing system incorporating pressurized fluid viscous spring-dampers is assumed as anti-seismic technology for the first solution. Thanks to the protective capacities of this technology, non-structural and structural operational performance levels are pursued for the building up to the maximum considered design earthquake level. A traditional concentric X-shaped configuration is selected for the second and third solution, which differ from each other in the design strategy adopted. In the first case, a ductility-based solution is chosen, by adopting a basic behaviour factor equal to 4, reduced by 20% to take into account the structural irregularity caused by the eccentric position of the intermediate floor of the building. In the second case, the same performance objectives as originally formulated for the viscous-dissipative design hypothesis are assumed, fixing the behaviour factor at 1. The resulting dimensions of the members, and the total weight and cost of the steel structure are compared for the three layouts. A substantially higher seismic performance at all normative design levels at a comparable cost; and a cut in the cost by about 50%, with an improved look of the structure due to the remarkably greater slenderness of the constituting members, come out for the viscous-dissipative bracing design as compared to the ductility-based and elastic X-bracing solutions, respectively.

 

KEYWORDS

Steel structures, Seismic protection, Fluid viscous dissipative bracing, Damping, Concentric bracing, Ductility-based design, Elastic design


REFERENCES

[1] Constantinou, M.C., Soong, T.T., and Dargush, G.F., “Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit”, Monograph Series No. 1, MCEER–Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering, Buffalo, NY, 1998.

[2] Hanson, R.D., and Soong, T.T., “Seismic Design with Supplemental Energy Dissipation Devices”, Publication MNO-8, EERI–Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 2001.

[3] Christopoulos, C., and Filiatrault, A., “Principles of Passive Supplemental Damping and Seismic Isolation”, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 2006.

[4] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Large-scale Experimental Validation of a Design Procedure for Damped Braced Steel Structures”, Proceedings of STESSA 2003 – 4 th International Conference on the Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Naples, Italy, 2003, pp. 657-662.

[5] Molina, F.J., Sorace, S., Terenzi, G., Magonette, G., and Viaccoz, B., “Seismic Tests on Reinforced Concrete and Steel Frames Retrofitted with Dissipative Braces”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2004, Vol. 33, No. 12, pp. 1373-1394.

[6] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Seismic Protection of Frame Structures by Fluid Viscous Damped Braces”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2008, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 45-55.

[7] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Advanced seismic retrofit of a low-rise R/C building”, Advanced Materials Research, 2012 (in press).

[8] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Shaking Table and Numerical Seismic Performance Evaluation of a Fluid Viscous-dissipative Bracing System”, Earthquake Spectra, 2012 (in press).

[9] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Fluid Viscous Damped-based Seismic Retrofit Strategies of Steel Structures: General Concepts and Design Applications”, Advanced Steel Construction, 2009, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 322-339.

[10] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “New Design and Seismic Retrofit Applications of Fluid Viscous-damped Bracing Systems”, Proceedings of Eurodyn 2011 – 8 th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Leuven, Belgium, 2011, Paper No. 562, CD-ROM.

[11] Italian Council of Public Works, “Technical Standards on Constructions” [in Italian], Rome, Italy, 2008.

[12] European Committee for Standardization, “Eurocode 3 – Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings”, EN 1993-1-1, Bruxelles, Belgium, 2005.

[13] European Committee for Standardization, “Eurocode 1 – Actions on Structures. Part 1-4: General Actions – Wind Actions”, EN 1991-1-4, Bruxelles, Belgium, 2005.

[14] American Society for Testing and Materials, “ASTM E1300-04 – Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance of Glass in Buildings”, West Conshohocken, USA, 2004.

[15] European Committee for Standardization, “Eurocode 8 – Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings”, EN 1998-1, Bruxelles, Belgium, 2004.

[16] Sorace, S., “Seismic Damage Assessment of Steel Frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1998, Vol. 124, No. 5, pp. 567-576.

[17] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Non-linear Dynamic Modelling and Design Procedure of FV Spring-dampers for Base Isolation”, Engineering Structures, 2001, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 1556-1567.

[18] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Non-linear Dynamic Design Procedure of FV Spring-dampers for Base Isolation — Frame Building Applications”, Engineering Structures, 2001, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 1568-1576.

[19] Sorace, S., Terenzi, G., Magonette, G., and Molina, F.J., “Experimental Investigation on a Base Isolation System Incorporating Steel-Teflon Sliders and Pressurized Fluid Viscous Spring Dampers”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 225-242.

[20] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “Analysis and Demonstrative Application of a Base Isolation/Supplemental Damping Technology”, Earthquake Spectra, 2008, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 775-793.

[21] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “The Damped Cable System for Seismic Protection of Frame Structures — Part I: General concepts, Testing and Modelling”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 915-928.

[22] Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G., “The Damped Cable System for Seismic Protection of Frame Structures — Part II: Design and Application”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 929-947.

[23] Pekcan, G., Mander, J.B., and Chen, S.S., “The Seismic Response of a 1:3 Scale Model R.C. Structure with Elastomeric Spring Dampers”, Earthquake Spectra, 1995, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 249-267.

[24] Jarret SL, “Shock-control Technologies”, URL http://www.introini.info, 2012.

[25] Computers & Structures Inc., “SAP2000NL. Structural Analysis Programs – Theoretical and Users Manual”, Release No. 14.03, Berkeley, CA, 2011.

[26] Giberson, M.F., “The Response of Nonlinear Multi-story Structures Subjected to Earthquake Excitation”, Doctoral Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA, 1967.

[27] Wen, Y., “Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems”, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 1976, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 249-263.