Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 199-223 (2006)



R. G. Beale*1 and M. H. R. Godley2

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane,

Headington, Oxford, OX3 OBP, UK

2Slender Structures Group, OCSLD, School of the Built Environment, Gipsy Lane,

Headington, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 OBP, UK

*Corresponding author, email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., tel(44)1865 483354, fax(44)1865 483637




View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote


This paper describes numerical modelling of tube and fitting access scaffold structures according to the new European standard EN12811. Firstly simplified one-and two-dimensional models are described. The results from these analyses are compared with the output from three dimensional finite element buckling and non-linear elastic analyses with good agreement. Bucking analyses show that effective lengths of tube and fitting scaffolds are strongly influenced by the pattern of ties to the building façade and in many cases much greater than those currently assumed in design being approximately equal to vertical tying increments and not the lift height. As a result of the analyses the authors recommend that the maximum vertical tying increments for large tube and fitting scaffolds should not be greater than every two levels. Wind loads parallel to façade were shown to generate uplift on some windward legs of façade braces which could cause premature failure of the scaffold. Current UK design practice which largely ignores the effects of wind loads is unconservative for large scaffolds. Recommendations for improved practice are made.



semi-riged connections, bucking analysis, scaffold structures, finite element analysis


[1] Dcalc, R.G and Godlcy, M.II.R., "The Analysis of Scaffolding Structures using LUSAS", Proceedings LUSAS 1995, Tewkesbury, 1995, pp. 10-24.

[2] Godlcy, M.H.R. and Beale, R.G, "Sway Stiffness of Scaffold Structures", Structural Engineer, 1997, 75(1), pp. 4-12.

[3] Godlcy, M.H.R. and Beale, R.G, "Analysis of Large Proprietary Access Scaffold Structures", Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings. 2001,146(1), pp. 31-40.

[4] Lightfoot. E. and Oliveto, G, "The Collapse Strength of Tubular Steel Scaffold Assemblies", Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers, 1997, Part 2, pp. 311-329.

[5] BS 5973:1993, "Code of practice for access and working scaffolds and special scaffold structures", British standards Institution. London. 1993.

[6] EN 12811-1, "Temporary works equipment. Part I: Scaffolds-Performance requirements and general design", European committee for standardisation. Brussels, 2003.

[7] NASC, "TG20:05 Guide to Good Practice for Scaffolding with Tubes and Fittings", National Access and Scaffolding Confederation. London, 2004.

[8] Godlcy, M.H.R. and Beale, R.G, "The Structural Behaviour of Tube and Fitting Access Scaffold Systems", Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Lisbon, Paper 251, 2004.

[9] EN74, "Couplers, Loose Spigots and Base-Plates for use in Working Scaffolds and Falsework made of Steel Tubes: Requirement and test procedures", British Standards Institution, London, 1988.

[10] LUSAS, "Lusas 13.4 User Manual", FEA Ltd. 2002.

[11] Milojkovic, B., Beale, R.G and Godley, M.H.R., "Modelling Scaffold Connections” Proceedings of the Fourth ACME UK Annual Conference, Glasgow, 19%. pp. 85-88.

[12] BS 6399-2, "Loading for Buildings. Code of Practice for wind load", British Standards Institution, London. 1997.