Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 157-172 (2005)


 SECOND-ORDER P-Δ-δ ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF ANGLE TRUSSES ALLOWING FOR IMPERFECTIONS AND SEMI-RIGID CONNECTIONS

 

S.L. Chan* and S.H. Cho

*Department of Civil and Structural Engineering,

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 Fax: (852) 2334 6389

 

DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2005.1.1.8

 

View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote

ABSTRACT

Single angle members have a broad range of applications, such as web members in roof trusses and bracingmembers in latticed towers. The structural behaviour of a single angle compression member in a truss is complicated.It is not uncommon to connect one angle member to another through their legs. Therefore, in practice, the member isunder an eccentric force which introduces a pair of end moments. However, in most design codes such as BS5950(2000) and Eurocode 3 (2003), these end moments are often ignored. To compensate for this load eccentricity, theRobertson constant in the Perry-Robertson formula is amplified so that the compressive strength is reduced for thenegligence of end eccentricities. In this method of analysis, all connections are assumed to be pin-jointed; while in thedesign, the effective length is assumed on the basis of connection types (e.g. single-bolted, double-bolted or welding)which violates the assumption in the analysis. This paper proposes a design method for angle trusses using nonlinearanalysis which eliminates the inconsistency between the analysis and the design. Laboratory tests of angles as webmembers of a truss were carried out. The test results are compared with the proposed theoretical and code designloads. In the proposed design method, there is no need to consider any effective length. The second-order P-Δand P-δeffects are considered automatically by geometry update. The proposed method is readily applicable to design ofpractical steel trusses made of angle sections.

 

KEYWORDS

Eccentricity, effective length, initial curvature, nonlinear analysis, second-order effects


REFERENCES

[1]     Chen WF and Lui EM. Stability design of steel frames. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1991. [2]   Trahair, NS. Restrained elastic beam-columns. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 1969;95(12):2641-2664.

[3]     Goodier, JN. The buckling of compressed bars by torsion and flexure. Cornell Univ Engineering Experimental Station Bulletin, 1941;27 Dec.

[4]     Goodier, JN. Flexural-torsional buckling of bars of open section, under bending, eccentric thrust or torsional loads. Cornell Univ Engineering Experimental Station Bulletin 1942; 28 Jan.

[5]     Foehl FP. Direct method of designing single angle struts in welded trusses, Design Book of Welding. Lincoln Electric Co., Cleveland, OH; 1948.

[6]     Kitipornchai S, Chan SL. Nonlinear finite element analysis of angle and tee beam-columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 1987;113(4):721-739.

[7]     Trahair NS, Usami T, Galambos TV. Eccentrically loaded single angle columns. Research Report No. 11. Structural Division, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA; 1969.

[8]     Adluri SMR, Madugula MKS. Eccentrically loaded steel angle struts. Engineering Journal, AISC 1992;31(3):59-66.

[9]     AISC. Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings. AISC Inc, Chicago; 1986.

[10]   AISC. Specification of allowable stress design. AISC Inc, Chicago; 1989.

[11]   Wakabayashi M, Nonaka T. On the buckling strength of angles in transmission towers. Bulleting of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Japan, Nov 1965;15(2):1-18.

[12]   Mueller WH, Erzurumlu H. Behaviour and strength of angles in compression: an experimental investigation. Research Report of Civil-Structural Engineering. Division of Engineering and Applied Science. Portland State University, Oregon, USA; 1983.

[13]   Ishida A. Experimental study on column carrying capacity of “SHY” steel angles. Yawata Technical Report. Yawata Iron and Steel Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan; Dec, 1968;265:8564-8582, 8761-8763.

[14]   Bathon L, Mueller WH, Kempner L. Ultimate load capacity of single steel angles. Journal of Structural Engineering 1993;119(1):279-300.

[15]   ASCE. Manuals and reports on engineering practice no 52. Guide for Design of Steel Transmission Towers, ASCE, New York; 1988.

[16]   Elgaaly M, Davids W, Dagher H. Non-slender single angle struts. Engineering Journal, AISC 1992;31(3):49-59.

[17]   NIDA. Non-linear integrated design and analysis computer program manual version 7 – ElePlast, NAF Series, User’s Manual. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; 2005.

[18]   BSI. Structural use of steelwork in building – Part 1: Code of practice for design – Rolled and welded sections”, BS5950, BSI, London; 2000.

[19]   CEN. Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for building. CEN, BSI, London; 1992.

[20]   Code of practice for structural design of steel structures – A limit state approach. Buildings Department, Hong Kong; 2005.

[21]   Chan SL, Cho SH. Design of steel frames using calibrated design curves for buckling strength of hot-rolled members. In: Chan SL, Teng JG, Chung KF, editors. Proceedings of Advances in Steel Structures. Elsevier, 2002. Elsevier Science. 1193-1199 .

[22]   Chan SL. Geometric and material nonlinear analysis of beam-columns and frames using the minimum residual displacement method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1988;26:2657-2669.

[23]   BSI. Metallic Materials – Tensile Testing – Part 1: Method of Test at Ambient Temperature, BS EN 10002. BSI, London; 2000.