Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 514-538(2018)


ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

AGAINST PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE IN

UFC 4-023-03: NUMERICAL SIMULATION

 

H.H. Li 1, 2, *, B.Y. Zhang 1, 2 and X.H. Cai 3

1 Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, 

Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China

2 Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters of 

the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, 

Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China

3 Architectural Design and Research Institute of HIT

*(Corresponding author: E-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">)

Received: 18 November 2016; Revised: 15 July 2017; Accepted: 19 September 2017

 

DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2018.14.4.1

 

View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote

ABSTRACT

Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 4-023-03): Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse published by the Department of Defense is one of the few design provisions that have been used around the US which provide design requirements on the basis of conventional design philosophy to the designers and the owners of the buildings against progressive collapse. These requirements are evaluated using numerical models which have been shown to be able to reasonably capture the behaviors of the buildings under column loss scenarios. A large number of case studies are conducted using validated three-dimensional macro-based models for four prototype buildings with different size, different height, different seismic detailing and different structural layouts. The simulation results show that the tie force method (TFM) is effective in protecting steel framed buildings against progressive collapse and can significantly reduce overall deformations of the structures after sudden loss of a column. However, the method for calculating the dynamic increase factor (DIF) proposed in the document is deemed problematic and thus a new energy-based approach is proposed to assess the peak dynamic displacement (PDD). The proposed method is shown to be accurate and reasonably conservative.

 

KEYWORDS

3-D macro-model, numerical simulation, UFC 4-023-03, tie force method, dynamic increase factor, peak dynamic displacement, energy-based method


REFERENCES

[1] ASCE 7-10, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures”, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013.

[2] UFC 4-023-03, “Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse”, Department of Defense, 2013.

[3] GSA, “Alternate Path Analysis & Design guidelines for Progressive Collapse Resistance”, U.S. General Service Administration, 2013.

[4] Moore, D.B., “The UK and European Regulations for Accidental Actions”, Proceedings of Workshop on Prevention of Progressive Collapse, National Institute of Building Sciences, 2002.

[5] Abruzzo, J., Matta, A. and Panariello, G., "Study of Mitigation Strategies for Progressive Collapse of a Reinforced Concrete Commercial Building", Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2006, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 384-390.

[6] UFC 4-023-03, “Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse”, Department of Defense, 2005.

[7] Li, Y., Lu, X., Guan, H. and Ye, L., “An Improved Tie Force Method for Progressive Collapse Resistance Design of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures”, Engineering Structures, 2011, Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 2931-2942.

[8] Tohidi,M., Yang, J. and Baniotopoulos, C., “Numerical Evaluation of Codified Design Methods for Progressive Collapse Resistance of Precast Concreate Cross Wall Structures”, Engineering Structures, 2014, Vol. 76, pp. 177-186.

[9] Main, J.A., “Composite Floor Systems under Column Loss: Collapse Resistance and Tie Force Requirements”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, Vol. 140, No. 8, A4014003.

[10] GSA, “Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Building and Major Modernization Project”, U.S. General Service Administration, 2003.

[11] Ruth, P., Marchand, K.A. and Williamson, E.B., “Static Equivalency in Progressive Collapse Alternate Path Analysis: Reducing Conservatism while Retaining Structural Integrity”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2006, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 349-364.

[12] Foley, C. M., Barnes, K. and Schneeman, C., “Quantifying and Enhancing Robustness in Steel Structures: Part 1 - Moment-Resisting Frames”, Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 2008, 4th Quarter, pp. 267-286.

[13] Khandelwal, K. and El-Tawil, S., “Pushdown Resistance as a Measure of Robustness in Progressive Collapse Analysis”, Engineering Structures, 2011, Vol. 33, No. 9, pp. 2653-2661.

[14] Liu, M., “A New Dynamic Increase Factor for Nonlinear Static Alternate Path Analysis of Building Frames Against Progressive Collapse”, Engineering Structures, 2013, Vol. 48, pp. 666-673.

[15] Yu, J., Rinder, T., Stolz, A., Tan, K.H. and Riedel, W., “Dynamic Progressive Collapse of an RC Assemblage Induced by Contact Detonation”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, Vol. 140, No. 6, A04014014.

[16] Ali, K., Mohsen, G. and Farshad, M., “Assessment of Dynamic Effect of Steel Frame due to Sudden Middle Column Loss”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2014, No. 23, No. 5, pp. 390-402.

[17] Liu, C., Tan, K.H. and Fung, T.C., “Investigations of Nonlinear Dynamic Performance of Top-and-Seat with Web Angle Connections subjected to Sudden Column Removal”, Engineering Structures, 2015, Vol. 99, pp. 449-461.

[18] Liu, C., Tan, K.H. and Fung, T. C., “Dynamic Behavior of Web Cleat Connections subjected to Sudden Column Removal Scenario”, Journal of Construction Steel Research, 2013, Vol. 86, pp. 92-106.

[19] Qian, K. and Li, B., “Quantification of Slab Influences on the Dynamic Performance of RC Frames against Progressive Collapse”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, Vol. 29, No. 1, 04014029.

[20] Liang, X., Shen, Q. and Ghosh, S.K., “Assessing Ability of Seismic Structural System to Withstand Progressive Collapse: Seismic Design and Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Frame Buildings”, Rep. Prepared for SK Ghosh and Associates, 2006.

[21] Khandelwal, K., El-Tawil, S., Kunnath, S.K. and Lew, H.S., “Macro-model Based Simulations of Progressive Collapse: Steel Frame Structures”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, Vol. 134, No. 7, pp. 1070-1078.

[22] Alashker, Y., Li, H. and El-Tawil, S., "Approximations in Progressive Modeling", Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011, Vol. 137, No. 9, pp. 914-924.

[23] FEMA 355C, “State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames subjected to Earthquake Ground Shaking”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.

[24] Foley, C. M., Martin, K. and Schneeman, C., “Robustness in Structural Steel Framing Systems”, Final Report Submitted to the American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., 2007.

[25] Hoffman, S.T., “Behavior and Performance of Steel Moment-Framed Buildings subjected to Dynamic Column Loss Scenarios”, Master Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 2010.

[26] Hallquist, J., “LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual”, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA, Version 971, 2006.

[27] Khandelwal, K. and El-Tawil, S., “Collapse Behavior of Steel Special Moment Resisting Frame Connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, Vol. 133, No. 5, pp. 646-655.

[28] Sadek, F., El-Tawil, S. and Lew, H.S., “Robustness of Composite Floor System with Shear Connections: Modeling, Simulation and Evaluation”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, Vol. 134, No. 11, pp. 1717-1725.

[29] Li, H. and El-Tawil, S., “Three-Dimensional Effects and Collapse Resistance Mechanisms in Steel Frame Buildings”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, Vol. 140, No. 8, A4014017

[30] ASCE 41-06., “Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings”, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007.

[31] Wight, J. and Macgregor, J., “Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (5th Edition)”, Prentice Hall, 2008.

[32] Alashker, Y. and El-Tawil, S., “A Design-oriented Model for the Collapse Resistance of Composite Floors Subjected to Column Loss”, Journal of Constructed Steel Research, 2011, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 84-92.

[33] McKay, A., Marchand, K. and Diaz, M., “Alternate Path Method in Progressive Collapse Analysis: Variation of Dynamic and Nonlinear Load Increase Factors”, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 152-160.

[34] Izzuddin, B.A., Vlassis, A.G., Elghazouli, A.Y. and Nethercot, D.A., “Progressive Collapse of Multi-Storey Buildings Due to Sudden Column Loss - Part I: Simplified Assessment Framework”, Engineering Structures, 2008, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 1308-1318.

[35] Li, L., Wang, W., Chen, Y. and Lu, Y., “Effect of Beam Web Bolt Arrangement on Catenary Behaviour of Moment Connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, Vol. 104, pp. 22-36.

[36] Guo L., Gao, S. and Fu, F., “Structural Performance of Semi-Rigid Composite Frame under Column Loss”, Engineering Structures, 2015, Vol. 95, pp. 112-126.

[37] Yang, B. and Tan, K.H., “Experimental Tests of Different Types of Bolted Steel Beam–column Joints under a Central-column-removal Scenario”, Engineering Structures, 2013, Vol. 54, pp. 112-130.

[38] Guo, L., Gao, S., Fu, F. and Wang, Y., “Experimental Study and Numerical Analysis of Progressive Collapse Resistance of Composite Frames”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, Vol. 89, pp. 236-251.

[39] Weigland, J. M. and Berman, J.W., “Integrity of Bolted Angle Connections Subjected to Simulated Column Removal”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, Vol. 142, No. 3, 04015165.

[40] Wang, W., Fang, C., Qin, X., Chen, Y. and Li, L., “Performance of Practical Beam-to-SHS Column Connections against Progressive Collapse”, Engineering Structures, 2016, Vol. 106, pp. 332-347.