Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 431-442 (2007)


STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN CODES: VEHICLES FOR IMPROVING PRACTICE OR FOR IMPLEMENTING RESEARCH?

 

D.A. Nethercot

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, UK

(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Received: 11 May 2006; Revised: 19 August 2006; Accepted: 22 August 2006

 

DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2007.3.1.2

 

View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote

ABSTRACT

Drawing on over 30 years of personal involvement with the preparation of codes of practice for structural steel design, the issue of academic elegance versus practitioner practicality is discussed. Several examples taken from recently produced codes are used to illustrate different manifestations of the issue.   The matter is discussed within the wider context of both the growing internationalisation of codes and the substantial supporting infrastructure needed by designers to efficiently implement their provisions.   Although the specifics relate largely to the design of steel buildings in the UK and the wider European context, it is thought that the points stated, lessons learned and recommendations made are of general relevance.

 

KEYWORDS

codes of practice, design, steel structures, structural engineering


REFERENCES

[1]   Baker, J.F., “Comparison of the Regulations Governing the Design of Steel Frame Buildings”, 1st Report of the Steel Structures Research Committee, London, HMSO, 1931.

[2]   American Institute of Steel Construction, “Stability of Metal Structures: A World View”, AISC, 1982.

[3]   British Standards Institution, “BS449: Part 2: 1969, The Use of Structural Steel in Building”, BSI, London, 1969.

[4]   Burnett, N., et al., “Plastic Design”, The British Constructural Steelwork Association Publication Number 28, London, 1965.

[5]   Horne, M.R., “The Plastic Design of Columns”, The British Constructional Steelwork Association Publication Number 23, London, 1964.

[6]   Flint, A.R., “The History, Scope, Aims and Principles of BS5400 in relation to Steel and Composite Bridges in the Design of Steel Bridges”, Edited by Rockey, K.C. and Evans, H.R. Granada, London, 1981.

[7]   Kulak, G.L., Fisher, J.W. and Struik, J.A.H., “Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints”, Second Edition, Wiley, New York, 1987.

[8]   Trahair, N.S., “Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures”, E and FN Spon, London, 1993.

[9]   Column Research Committee of Japan, “Handbook of Structural Stability”, Corena, Tokyo, 1971.

[10] Menzies, J.B., “CP117 and Shear Connectors in Steel-concrete Composite Beams, March 1976”, The Structural Engineer, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 137-153.

[11] Patrick, M., “Composite Beam Shear Connection Design and Detailing Practices for Australian Steel Decks”, Report Number CCTR/CBSC-001-04, University of Western Sydney, July 2004.

[12] Chen, W.F. and Atsuta, T., “Theory of Beam –Columns: Vol. 2, Space Behaviour and Design”, McGraw Hill, 1977.

[13] Boissonnade, N. et al., “Improvement of the Interaction Formulae for Beam-columns in Eurocode 3”, Computers and Structures, 2002, Vol. 80, pp. 2375-2385.

[14] Lindner, J., “Design of Beams and Beam Columns”, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2003, Vol. 5, pp. 38-47.

[15] Institution of Structural Engineers, “National Strategy for Implementation of the Structural Eurocodes; Design Guidance”, Report to Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (www.istructe.org.uk/eurocodes), 2004.