Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 442-462 (2014)




Lucia Tirca1,* and Liang Chen2

Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering,

Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

2 Department of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada

*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. )

Received: 21 April 2013; Revised: 27 August 2013; Accepted: 13 September 2013




View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote


Concentrically braced frames (CBFs) with a tension-compression bracing system dissipate hysteretic energy when braces yield in tension and buckle in compression, whereas the hysteretic response of hallow structural section (HSS) braces varies with brace slenderness, width-to-thickness ratio, and yield strength. Modelling the nonlinear response of braces upon the fracture requires an assigned brace fracture model and implicitly calibrated input material parameters. The selected brace fracture models are those that are compatible to nonlinear analysis and fiber-based elements formulation suited to OpenSees framework. To replicate the brace response, nonlinear beam-column elements that encompass distributed plasticity and discretized fiber cross-sections were used, whereas to simulate brace fracture, the strain fatigue model was considered. In this study, in order to predict the failure strain for a single reversal value that is required as input parameter in the strain fatigue model, regression analysis was employed and the proposed equation was given for square HSS braces and validated against experimental test results for a wide range of brace slenderness ratios, 50kL/r 150 and types of displacement loading history. The predicted failure strain value is expressed in terms of slenderness ratio, width-to-thickness ratio and yield strength of steel. Comparisons to existing brace fracture models, such as the strain-range and end-rotation of braces at fracture, are provided. All aforementioned brace fracture models were evaluated against experimental tests results, while replicating fourteen specimens that were found in the literature.



HSS braces, brace fracture models, inelastic response, strain, buckling, yielding, fracture, fatigue material


[1] CSA. CAN/CSA-S16-09, “Limit States Design of Steel Structures”, Rexdale, Ontario, Canadian Standard Association, 2009.

[2] Lehman, D.E., Roeder, C. W., Herman, D., Johnson, S., Kotulka, B., “Improved Seismic Performance of Gusset Plate Connections”, Journal of Structural Eng., ASCE, 2008, Vol. 134, No. 6, pp. 890-901.

[3] Hsiao, P.C., Lehman, D., Roeder, C., “A Model to Simulate Special Concentrically Braced Frames Beyond Brace Fracture”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2013, Vol. 42, pp. 182-200.

[4] Lee, S. and Goel, S.C., “Seismic Behavior of Hollow and Concrete-filled Square Tubular Bracing Members”, Research Report UMCE 87–11, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1987.

[5] Archambault, M.H., “Etude du Comportement Seismique des Contreventements Ductile en X avec Profiles Tubulaires en Acier”, Report no. EPM/GCS-1995-09, Montreal, Canada, Ecole Polytechnique, 1995.

[6] Shaback, B. “Behaviour of Square HSS Braces with end Connections under Reversed Cyclic Axial Loading”, Master thesis in the Dep. of Civil Eng., University of Calgary, Calgary, 2001.

[7] Shaback, B. and Brown, T., “Behaviour of Square Hollow Structural Steel Braces with end Connections under Reversed Cyclic Axial Loading”, Canadian J. of Civil Engineering, 2003, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 745-753.

[8] Yang, T.Y. and Mahin, S., “Limiting Net Section Fracture in Slotted Tube Braces”, Steel Tips, Structural Steel Education Council, Orinda, Ca., 2005.

[9] Fell, B.V., Kanvinde, A.M., Deierleine, G.G., Myers, A.M., Fu, X., “Backling and Fracture of Concentric Braces under Inelastic Loading”, Steel Tips, Tehnical Information and Product Service, Structural Steel Education Concil, Moroga, CA., 2006.

[10] Han, S.M., Kim, W.T., Foutch, D.A., “Seismic Behaviour of HSS Bracing Members According to Width-thickness Ratio under Symmetric Cyclic Loading”, J. Struct. Eng., 2007, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 264-273.

[11] Tremblay, R., “Inelastic Seismic Response of Steel Bracing Members”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2002, Vol. 58, pp. 665-701.

[12] Lee, K. and Bruneau, M., “Energy Dissipation of Compression Members in Concentrically Braced Frames: Review of Experimental Data”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2005, Vol. 131, No. 4, pp. 552-559.

[13] Uriz, P. and Mahin, S., “Toward Earthquake Resistant Design of Concentrically Braced Steel Frame Structures”, PEER Report 2008/08.

[14] Uriz, P., “Towards Earthquake Resistant Design of Concentrically Braced Steel Buildings”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.

[15] Tremblay, R., Archambault, M.H., Filiatrault. A., “Seismic Response of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames Made with Rectangular Hollow Bracing Members”, Journal of Structural Eng., ASCE, 2003, Vol. 129, No. 12, pp.1626-1636.

[16] Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M., Fenves, G. et al., “OpenSees User Manual”, 2007,

[17] Santagati, S., Bolognini, D., Nascimbene, R., “Strain Life Analysis at Low-cycle Fatigue on Concentrically Braced Steel Structures with RHS Shape Braces”, J. Earthquake Eng., 2012, Vol.16 (S1), pp. 107-137.

[18] Salawdeh, S. and Goggins, J., “Numerical Simulation for Steel Brace Members Incorporating a Fatigue Model”, Engineering Structures, 2013, Vol. 46, pp. 332-349.

[19] Lignos, D. and Karamanci, E., “Predictive Equations for Modelling Cyclic Buckling and Fracture of Steel Braces”, 10th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, March 1-2, 2013, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 2013.

[20] Tremblay, R., “Influence of Brace Slenderness on the Fracture Life of Rectangular Tubular Steel Bracing Members Subjected to Seismic Inelastic Loading”, Proc. 2008 ASCE Structures Congress, Vancouver, BC., 2008.

[21] Hsiao, P.C., Lehman, D., Roeder, C., “Improved Analytical Model for Special Concentrically Braced Frames”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, Vol. 73, pp.80-94.

[22] ASTM. ASTM E 1049–85,” Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003.

[23] Xue, L., “A Unified Expression for Low Cycle Fatigue and Extremely Low Cycle Fatigue and its Implication for Monotonic Loading”, International Journal of Fatigue 2008, Vol. 30 (10–11), pp. 1691–1698.

[24] Manson, S., “Fatigue: A complex Subject - some Simple Approximations”, Experimental Mechanics, 1965, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 193-226.

[25] Coffin, L., “A Study of the Effect of Cyclic Thermal Stresses on a Ductile Metal”, Trans ASME, 1954, Vol. 1954, No. 76, pp. 931–950.

[26] Uriz, P., Filippou, F.C., Mahin, S., “Model for Cyclic Inelastic Buckling of Steel Braces”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2008, pp. 619-628.

[27] Aguero, A., Izvernari, C., Tremblay, R., “Modelling of the Seismic Response of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames Using the OpenSees Analysis Environment”, International Journal of Advanced Steel Construction, 2006, Vol. 2-3, pp. 242-274.

[28] Scot, M.H. and Fenves, G.L., “Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-based Beam-column Elements”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 244-252.

[29] Yoo, J.H., Lehman, D., Roeder, C., “Influence of Gusset Plate Parameters on the Seismic Resistance of Braced Frames”, J. of Constructional Steel Research, 2008, Vol. 64, pp. 607-623.

[30] Dicleli, M. and Mehta, A., “Simulation of Inelastic Cyclic Buckling Behaviour of Steel Box Sections”, Computer and Structures Journal, 2007, pp. 446-457.

[31] Ziemian, R., “Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures”, J. Wiley & Sons, 2010.

[32] Li, S.J., Cui, T.C., Hao, Y.L., Yang, R., “Fatigue Properties of a Metastable b-type Titanium Alloy with Reversible Phase Transformation”, Acta Biomaterialia Journal, Elsevier, 2008, Vol. 4, pp. 305-317.