Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165-184(2015)



W.-H. Kang1,*, B. Uy2, Z. Tao1 and S. Hicks3

1 Institute for Infrastructure Engineering, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia

2 Centre for Infrastructure Engineering & Safety, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

3 Heavy Engineering Research Association, Manukau, Auckland City, New Zealand

*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Received: 18 March 2013; Revised: 17 June 2014; Accepted: 24 June 2014




View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote


The purpose of this paper is to recalibrate the capacity reduction factors, estimate the reliability of current equations, and investigate the effect of these factors in AS 5100.6, the Australian Bridge Standard for concrete-filled steel tubular columns. This work has important ramifications for other international codes of practice as the Australian code has the identical or similar underlying design philosophy with Eurocode 4, AISC and the code of practice in Hong Kong. The method developed by Johnson and Huang is extensively applied to the Australian code format to recalibrate the capacity factors in AS 5100 for a target reliability of β = 3.04 based on an extensive database of 1,583 test results covering a wide range of input parameter values. In addition, an inverse analysis procedure based on Johnson and Huang’s method is proposed to estimate the reliability of design equations with known capacity factors. The analysis results show that the interaction between the concrete and steel needs to be considered for the current capacity factors in AS 5100. The results also show that the current capacity factors provide greater reliability than the target reliability suggested in AS 5104:2005/ISO 2394:1998, but after considering the additional uncertainties created due to the application of multiple capacity factors, the reliability was almost the same as the recommended value. In conclusion, the current capacity factor values in AS 5100 are adequate with regards to safety and can be maintained, but better optimised values would be preferable to improve the cost-safety balance.



Capacity factors, Composite structures, Concrete-filled steel columns, Design strength, Safety factor calibration


[1] Shams, M. and Saadeghvaziri, M.A., “State of the Art of Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Columns”, ACI Structural Journal, 1997, Vol. 94, No.5, pp. 558-571.

[2] Chitawadagi, M.V., Narasimhan, M.C. and Kulkarni, S., “Axial Capacity of Rectangular Concrete-filled Steel Tube Columns-DOE Approach”, Construction and Building Materials, 2010, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 585-595.

[3] Standards Australia International Ltd., “AS 5100.6:2004 Bridge Design, Part 6: Steel and Composite Construction”, New South Wales, Australia, 2004.

[4] British Standards Institution, “BS EN 1994-1-1:2005 Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures”, Part 1-1. London, UK, 2005.

[5] American Institute of Steel Construction, “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-10”, Chicago, IL, USA, 2010.

[6] Buildings Department of Hong Kong, “Code of Practice for Structural Use of Steel”, Buildings Department, the HKSAR Government. Hong Kong, 2005.

[7] Tao, Z., Uy, B., Han, L.H. and He, S.H., “Design of Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Members According to the Australian Standard AS 5100 Model and Calibration”, Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 197-214.

[8] Goode, C.D., “A Review and Analysis of over One Thousand Tests on Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns”, Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Steel-Concrete Composite and Hybrid Structures, Harbin, China, 2006, August 12-15.

[9] Wu, F.Y., “Compressive Behaviour of Recycled Concrete-filled Steel Tubes”, Masters Thesis, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, China, 2006. (in Chinese).

[10] Gupta, P.K., Sarda, S.M. and Kumar, M.S., “Experimental and Computational Study of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns under Axial Loads”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 182-193.

[11] Lue, D.M., Liu, J.L. and Yen, T., “Experimental Study on Rectangular CFT Columns with High-Strength Concrete”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 37-44.

[12] Tao, Z., Han, L.H. and Wang, D.Y., “Experimental Behaviour of Concrete-filled Stiffened Thin-walled Steel Tubular Columns”, Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 517-527.

[13] Yu, Z.W., Ding, F.X. and Cai, C.S., “Experimental Behavior of Circular Concrete-filled Steel Tube Stub Columns”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 165-174.

[14] Yang, Y.F. and Han, L.H., “Concrete Filled Steel Tube (CFST) Columns Subjected to Concentrically Partial Compression”, Thin-Walled Structures, 2012, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 147-156.

[15] Chang, X., Fu, L., Zhao, H.B. and Zhang, Y.B., “Behaviors of Axially Loaded Circular Concrete-filled Steel Tube (CFT) Stub Columns with Notch in Steel Tubes”, Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, Vol. 73, pp. 273-280.

[16] Johnson, R.P. and Huang D., “Statistical Calibration of Safety Factors for Encased Composite Columns”, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete III, ASCE, New York, 1997, pp. 380-391.

[17] Yu, Q., Tao, Z. and Wu, Y.X., “Experimental Behaviour of High Performance Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Columns”, Thin-Walled Structures, 2008, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 362-370.

[18] Chen, Z., Zhu, J. and Wu, P., “High Strength Concrete and its Application”, Beiing, China, Tsinghua University Press, 1996. (in Chinese).

[19] Gulvanesian, H. and Holicky, M., “Annex C – Calibration Proceedure”, Leondardo DaVinci Pilot Project CZ/02/B/F/PP-134007, Handbook 2-Reliability Backgrounds, 2005.

[20] Ang, A.H.S. and Tang, W.H., “Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering”, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.

[21] Joint Committee on Structural Safety, JCSS Probabilistic Model Code,, 2001.

[22] Standards Australia International Ltd., “AS 3600:2009 Concrete Structures”, New South Wales, Australia, 2009.

[23] Standards New Zealand, “NZS 3104: 2003 Specification for Concrete Production”, Wellington, New Zealand, 2003.

[24] Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, “AS/NZS 1163:2009 Cold-Formed Structural Steel Hollow Sections”, Sydney, Australia, 2009.

[25] Kang, W.H., Uy, B., Tao, Z. and Hicks, S., “Statistical Safety Factor Calibration of Short Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Columns”, Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, ACMSM 22, Sydney, Australia, 2012, December 11-14.

[26] Standards Australia International Ltd., “AS 5104: 2005 General Principles on Reliability for Structures”, New South Wales, Australia, 2005.

[27] International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 2394:1998 General Principals on Reliability for Structures”, Geneva, 1998.

[28] Standards Australia International Ltd., “AS/NZS 1170.0: 2002 Structural Design Actions – General Principles”, New South Wales, Australia, 2002.

[29] Nocedal, J and Wright, S., “Numerical Optimization. 2nd ed.”, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2006, ISBN 978-0-387-30303-1.