Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 254-261 (2023)


 OPTIMIZATION OF STIFFNESS AND DAMPING COEFFICIENTS OF

CONNECTION DAMPERS TO REDUCE THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF

TRANSMISSION LINE STEEL TOWERS SUBJECTED TO WIND ACTION

 

Luiz Guilherme Grotto 1, *, Letícia Fleck Fadel Miguel 2 and João Kaminski Junior 3

1 Postgraduate Program in Mechanical Engineering (PROMEC), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil, ORCID 0000-0002-1392-9033

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering (DEMEC), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil, ORCID 0000-0001-9165-4306

3 Department of Structures and Civil Construction (DECC), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Brazil, ORCID 0000-0001-9912-0691

* (Corresponding author: E-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Received: 8 September 2022; Revised: 21 April 2023; Accepted: 10 May 2023

 

DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2023.19.3.6

 

View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote

ABSTRACT

Tall and slender latticed steel towers, such as power transmission line towers, are very susceptible to vibrations imposed mainly by wind action. Thus, changing the design layout or making use of vibration control devices is often necessary to reduce vibration amplitudes and avoid the collapse of the structure. In this work, an alternative to the conventional types of commercial dampers is the use of elements in the connections of the structure, such as rubber rings working like connection dampers, so they can dissipate the energy of the system reducing the dynamic response of the tower. Thus, this work proposes a methodology for the optimization of stiffness and damping coefficients of connection dampers in structures of latticed steel towers of Transmission Lines (TL) that are subjected to the dynamic effects of wind. An illustrative example is presented. First, the structure is evaluated considering perfectly rigid connections; then the stiffness and damping coefficient of the connections are optimized in order to minimize the vibration amplitudes of the tower. Finally, the natural frequencies, damping ratios and maximum horizontal displacements are compared for situations of perfectly rigid and semi-rigid connections. The results show that the optimization process results in a structure with a fundamental frequency of vibration similar to that of the original tower, however a significant reduction in the horizontal displacements can be observed, since an increase in damping occurs, thus proving the capacity of the proposed methodology.

 

KEYWORDS

Latticed metallic tower, Wind action, Semi-rigid connection, Dynamic analysis, Optimization


REFERENCES

[1] Muscolino G., Palmeri A. and Recupero A., “Seismic analysis of steel frames with a viscoelastic model of semi-rigid connections”, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE 2004), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Paper Number 2783, 2004.

[2] Zlatkov D., Zdravković S., Mladenović B. and Stojić R., “Matrix formulation of dynamic design of structure with semi-rigid connections”, Facta Universitatis, series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 333(5), 89-104, 2011.

[3] Ye J. and Xu L., “Member discrete element method for static and dynamic responses analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid joints”, Applied Sciences, 7(7), 714, 2017.

[4] Masoodi A. R. and Moghaddam S. H., “Nonlinear dynamic analysis and natural frequencies of gabled frame having flexible restraints and connections”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(6), 1819-1824, 2015.

[5] Raftoyiannis I. G. and Polyzois D. J., “The effect of semi-rigid connections on the dynamic behavior of tapered composite GFRP poles”, Composite Structures, 81(1), 70-79, 2007.

[6] Basiński W. and Kowal Z., “Analysis of oscillatory motion of SIN girders with semirigid joints”, Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 9(4), 55-65, 2016.

[7] Daryan A. S., Sadri M., Saberi H., Saberi V. and Moghadas A. B., “Behavior of semi-rigid connections and semi-rigid frames”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(3), 210-238, 2014

[8] Wang J. F., Wang J. and Wang H., “Seismic behavior of blind bolted CFST frames with semi-rigid connections”, Structures, 9, 91-104, 2017.

[9] Hao-Xiang H., Li-Can L. and Shi-Tao C., “Damping performance experiment and damage analysis of replacement connection with low-yield-point steel”, Adv. Steel Constr., 17 (2), 169-180, 2021.

[10] Sekulovic M. S., Salatic R. M. and Mandic R. S., “Seismic analysis of frames with semi-rigid eccentric connections”, Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE 2000), Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.

[11] Cacciola P., Colajanni P. and Muscolino G., “Stochastic sensitivity of steel frames with connection dampers by modal analysis”, Proceedings of the 20th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC 2002), Los Angeles, California, USA, 2002.

[12] Attarnejad R., Ghareshiran M. R. and Pirmoz A., “Seismic performance of semi-rigid frames with connections dampers”, Proceedings of the 8th National Congress on Civil Engineering (8NCCE), Babol, Iran, 2014.

[13] Zhang, Y.X., Lui, A.R., Zhang, A.L. and Liu, X.C., “Seismic performance analysis of a resilient prestressed steel frame with intermediate column containing friction dampers”, Adv. Steel Constr., 13 (3), 241-257, 2017.

[14] Meng-Yao Cheng et al., “Experimental study of hysteretic behavior of resilient prefabricated steel frames with and without intermediate columns”, Adv. Steel Constr., 18 (3), 715-727, 2022.

[15] Köroğlu M. A., Köken A. and Dere Y., “Use of different shaped steel slit dampers in beam to column connections of steel frames under cycling loading”, Adv. Steel Constr., 14 (2), 251-273, 2018.

[16] Singh M. P. and Moreschi L. M., “Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31, 955-976, 2002.

[17] Si Y., Karimi H. R., Gao H., “Modelling and optimization of a passive structural control design for a spar-type floating wind turbine”, Engineering Structures, 69, 168-182, 2014.

[18] Brandão F da S, Miguel LFF. Vibration control in buildings under seismic excitation using optimized tuned mass dampers. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 2020;14(54):66-87. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.54.05

[19] Brandão F da S, de Almeida AK, Miguel LFF. Optimum design of single and multiple tuned mass dampers for vibration control in buildings under seismic excitation. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 2022; 2250078 (27 pages). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945542250078X

[20] Brito JWS, Miguel LFF. Optimization of a reinforced concrete structure subjected to dynamic wind action. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 2022; online. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.59.22

[21] Fadel Miguel, LF, Lopez RH, Miguel LFF, Torii, AJ. A novel approach to the optimum design of MTMDs under seismic excitations. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2016a;23(11): 1290-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1845

[22] Fadel Miguel, LF, Lopez RH, Torii, AJ, Miguel LFF, Beck AT. Robust design optimization of TMDs in vehicle–bridge coupled vibration problems. Engineering Structures 2016b;126:703-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.033

[23] Miguel LFF, Santos GP. Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers for road bridges taking into account bridge-vehicle interaction, random pavement roughness, and uncertainties. Shock and Vibration 2021;2021 (6620427):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6620427

[24] Ontiveros-Pérez SP, Miguel LFF. Reliability-based optimum design of multiple tuned mass dampers for minimization of the probability of failure of buildings under earthquakes. Structures 2022;42:144-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.015

[25] Rossato BB, Miguel LFF. Robust optimum design of tuned mass dampers for high-rise buildings subject to wind-induced vibration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2022; online. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/naco.2021060

[26] Vellar LS, Ontiveros-Pérez SP, Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF. Robust optimum design of multiple tuned mass dampers for vibration control in buildings subjected to seismic excitation. Shock and Vibration 2019;2019(9273714):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9273714

[27] Wen-Tao Qiao et al., “Study on dynamic behaviors and vibration reduction techniques on cable-supported ribbed beam composite slab”, Adv. Steel Constr., 15 (1), 73-81, 2019.

[28] Mensah A. F. and Dueñas-Osorio L., “Improved reliability of wind turbine towers with tuned liquid column dampers (TLCDs)”, Structural Safety, 47, 78-86, 2014.

[29] Zhang Z., Li J., Nielsen S. R. K. and Basu B., “Mitigation of edgewise vibrations in wind turbine blades by means of roller dampers”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333, 5283-5298, 2014.

[30] Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF, Lopez RH. Robust design optimization of friction dampers for structural response control. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2014;21(9):1240-1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1642

[31] Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF, Lopez RH. A firefly algorithm for the design of force and placement of friction dampers for control of man-induced vibrations in footbridges. Optimization and Engineering 2015;16:633-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9269-3

[32] Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF, Lopez RH. Simultaneous optimization of force and placement of friction dampers under seismic loading. Engineering Optimization 2016a;48(4):582-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2015.1025774

[33] Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF, Lopez RH. Failure probability minimization of buildings through passive friction dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 2016b;25(17):869-885. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1287

[34] Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF, Lopez RH. Methodology for the simultaneous optimization of location and parameters of friction dampers in the frequency domain. Engineering Optimization 2018;50(12):2108-2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2018.1428318

[35] Ontiveros-Pérez SP, Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF. Optimization of location and forces of friction dampers. REM - International Engineering Journal 2017a;70(3):273-279. https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672015700065

[36] Ontiveros-Pérez SP, Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF. Robust simultaneous optimization of friction damper for the passive vibration control in a Colombian building. Procedia Engineering 2017b;199:1743-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.430

[37] Ontiveros-Pérez SP, Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF. A new assessment in the simultaneous optimization of friction dampers in plane and spatial civil structures. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2017c;2017(6040986):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6040986

[38] Ontiveros-Pérez SP, Miguel LFF, Riera JD. Reliability-based optimum design of passive friction dampers in buildings in seismic regions. Engineering Structures 2019;190:276-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.021

[39] Ribakov Y. and Reinhorn A. M., “Design of amplified structural damping using optimal considerations”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 1422-1427, 2003.

[40] Murotsu Y., Okada H. and Shao S., “Reliability-based design of transmission line structures under extreme wind loads”, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 93), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3, 1675-1681, 1994.

[41] Miguel L. F. F. and Fadel Miguel L. F., “Assessment of modern metaheuristic algorithms-HS, ABC and FA-in shape and size optimization of structures with different types of constraints”, International Journal of Metaheuristics, 2, 256-293, 2013.

[42] Gerdau, Equal leg angle profile catalog, online, Available in <https://www2.gerdau.com.br/produtos/cantoneira-gerdau>, 2021.

[43] Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 2021 R2, Help System, Combin40 Element Description, ANSYS, Inc 2021.

[44] Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT), NBR 6123: Wind loads on edifications, Rio de Janeiro, 1988.

[45] Shinozuka M. and Jan C. M., “Digital simulation of random processes and its applications”, Journal of Sound and Vibrations, 25, 111-128, 1972.

[46] Miguel L. F. F., Fadel Miguel L. F., Riera J. D., Kaminski Jr. J. and Menezes R. C. R., “Assessment of code recommendations through simulation of EPS wind loads along a segment of a transmission line”, Engineering Structures, 43, 1-11, 2012.

[47] Mirjalili S. and Lewis A., “The whale optimization algorithm”, Advances in Engineering Software, 95, 51-67, 2016.

[48] Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT), NBR 8850: Execução de suportes metálicos treliçados para linhas de transmissão - Procedimento, Rio de Janeiro, 2003.